Bolt.new vs Kiro
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Bolt.new
Kiro
Bolt.new vs Kiro comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Bolt.new is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Bolt.new and Kiro compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Bolt.new leans on out-of-the-box supabase integration while Kiro emphasizes spec-driven development (requirements → design → tasks), so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Bolt.new offers enterprise, whereas Kiro lists free (500 credits) + paid credits (pay-as-you-go). Feature-wise, Bolt.new shines with out-of-the-box supabase integration and full-stack app creation, while Kiro stands out for spec-driven development (requirements → design → tasks) and autonomous agents and autopilot mode for complex work. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Bolt.new if you need Rapid Prototyping and want a stack centered on Cloud Platforms & Prototyping. Pick Kiro when you value Complex feature development and prefer a tool that matches Developer IDEs & Agents. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Interface Comparison
Bolt.new
Kiro
Side-by-side interface comparison
Vibe Score Breakdown
Bolt.new
Kiro
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Bolt.new | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Enterprise | Free (500 credits) + paid credits (pay-as-you-go) |
| Trusted Rating | 4.4/5 (Product Hunt) | N/A |
| Primary Category | Cloud Platforms & Prototyping | Developer IDEs & Agents |
| Best For | Rapid Prototyping | Complex feature development |
| Key Strength | Out-of-the-box Supabase integration | Spec-driven development (requirements → design → tasks) |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Bolt.new vs Kiro
- What is the main difference between Bolt.new and Kiro?
- Bolt.new focuses on out-of-the-box supabase integration while Kiro highlights spec-driven development (requirements → design → tasks). Both target vibe coding workflows, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Check the Vibe Score Breakdown above; higher flow and speed numbers signal smoother iteration for your team.
- How do Bolt.new and Kiro compare on pricing?
- Bolt.new lists enterprise, whereas Kiro offers free (500 credits) + paid credits (pay-as-you-go). Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Bolt.new vs Kiro?
- Bolt.new fits teams that value Rapid Prototyping, while Kiro suits those prioritizing Complex feature development. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Bolt.new vs Kiro comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow