Bolt.new vs Cursor
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Bolt.new
Cursor
Bolt.new vs Cursor comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Cursor is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Bolt.new and Cursor compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Bolt.new leans on out-of-the-box supabase integration while Cursor emphasizes full ide with ai-native features, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Bolt.new offers enterprise, whereas Cursor lists free / $20/mo and up. Feature-wise, Bolt.new shines with out-of-the-box supabase integration and full-stack app creation, while Cursor stands out for full ide with ai-native features and autocomplete and intelligent refactoring. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Bolt.new if you need Rapid Prototyping and want a stack centered on Cloud Platforms & Prototyping. Pick Cursor when you value Professional Developers and prefer a tool that matches Developer IDEs & Agents. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Interface Comparison
Bolt.new
Cursor
Side-by-side interface comparison
Vibe Score Breakdown
Bolt.new
Cursor
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Bolt.new | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Enterprise | Free / $20/mo and up |
| Trusted Rating | 4.4/5 (Product Hunt) | 4.5/5 (G2) |
| Primary Category | Cloud Platforms & Prototyping | Developer IDEs & Agents |
| Best For | Rapid Prototyping | Professional Developers |
| Key Strength | Out-of-the-box Supabase integration | Full IDE with AI-native features |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Bolt.new vs Cursor
- What is the main difference between Bolt.new and Cursor?
- Bolt.new focuses on out-of-the-box supabase integration while Cursor highlights full ide with ai-native features. Both target vibe coding workflows, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Cursor leads in the Flow State dimension of the Vibe Score, so teams wanting fewer interruptions and faster loops should start there.
- How do Bolt.new and Cursor compare on pricing?
- Bolt.new lists enterprise, whereas Cursor offers free / $20/mo and up. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Bolt.new vs Cursor?
- Bolt.new fits teams that value Rapid Prototyping, while Cursor suits those prioritizing Professional Developers. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Bolt.new vs Cursor comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow