Cursor vs Google AntiGravity
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Cursor
Google AntiGravity
Cursor vs Google AntiGravity comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Google AntiGravity is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Cursor and Google AntiGravity compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Cursor leans on full ide with ai-native features while Google AntiGravity emphasizes agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Cursor offers free tier, pro $20/mo, whereas Google AntiGravity lists free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers tba. Feature-wise, Cursor shines with full ide with ai-native features and autocomplete and intelligent refactoring, while Google AntiGravity stands out for agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces and multi-agent workflows that coordinate editor, terminal, and browser. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Cursor if you need Professional Developers and want a stack centered on Developer IDEs & Agents. Pick Google AntiGravity when you value Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs and prefer a tool that matches Developer IDEs & Agents. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Vibe Score Breakdown
Cursor
Google AntiGravity
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Cursor | Google AntiGravity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier, Pro $20/mo | Free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers TBA |
| Primary Category | Developer IDEs & Agents | Developer IDEs & Agents |
| Best For | Professional Developers | Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs |
| Key Strength | Full IDE with AI-native features | Agent-first architecture with Manager and Editor surfaces |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Cursor vs Google AntiGravity
- What is the main difference between Cursor and Google AntiGravity?
- Cursor focuses on full ide with ai-native features while Google AntiGravity highlights agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces. Both target developer ides & agents, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Cursor leads in the Flow State dimension of the Vibe Score, so teams wanting fewer interruptions and faster loops should start there.
- How do Cursor and Google AntiGravity compare on pricing?
- Cursor lists free tier, pro $20/mo, whereas Google AntiGravity offers free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers tba. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Cursor vs Google AntiGravity?
- Cursor fits teams that value Professional Developers, while Google AntiGravity suits those prioritizing Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Cursor vs Google AntiGravity comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.