Vibe Coding Battle

Cody vs Cursor

The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.

Cody logo - Cody vs Cursor comparison

Cody

82Vibe Score
4.5/5
G2 Trusted Score
VS
Cursor logo - Cody vs Cursor comparison

Cursor

92Vibe Score
4.5/5
G2 Trusted Score

Cody vs Cursor comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.

Why these tools are being compared

Both Cody and Cursor compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Cody leans on code graph context while Cursor emphasizes full ide with ai-native features, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.

Feature and pricing takeaways

On pricing, Cody offers free / $9/mo and up, whereas Cursor lists free / $20/mo and up. Feature-wise, Cody shines with code graph context and enterprise workflows, while Cursor stands out for full ide with ai-native features and autocomplete and intelligent refactoring. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.

Who should choose each tool

Choose Cody if you need Enterprise Teams and want a stack centered on AI Assistants & Code Review. Pick Cursor when you value Professional Developers and prefer a tool that matches Developer IDEs & Agents. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.

Interface Comparison

Cursor

Cursor interface screenshot showing key features and workflow

Side-by-side interface comparison

Vibe Score Breakdown

Cody vibe coding tool logoCody

Flow State
75/100
AI Intelligence
90/100
Speed
80/100
Vibe Factor
70/100

Cursor vibe coding tool logoCursor

Flow State
95/100
AI Intelligence
90/100
Speed
85/100
Vibe Factor
98/100

Feature Showdown

FeatureCodyCursor
PricingFree / $9/mo and upFree / $20/mo and up
Trusted Rating4.5/5 (G2)4.5/5 (G2)
Primary CategoryAI Assistants & Code ReviewDeveloper IDEs & Agents
Best ForEnterprise TeamsProfessional Developers
Key StrengthCode graph contextFull IDE with AI-native features
AI ModelIntegratedIntegrated

FAQs: Cody vs Cursor

What is the main difference between Cody and Cursor?
Cody focuses on code graph context while Cursor highlights full ide with ai-native features. Both target vibe coding workflows, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
Which tool is better for speed and flow?
Cursor leads in the Flow State dimension of the Vibe Score, so teams wanting fewer interruptions and faster loops should start there.
How do Cody and Cursor compare on pricing?
Cody lists free / $9/mo and up, whereas Cursor offers free / $20/mo and up. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
Who should choose Cody vs Cursor?
Cody fits teams that value Enterprise Teams, while Cursor suits those prioritizing Professional Developers. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.

In summary, Cody vs Cursor comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.

Ready to make your choice?

Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow

Cody logo

Cody

Cody by Sourcegraph - Enterprise AI

Enterprise TeamsLarge Codebases
Try Cody Free →
Cursor logo

Cursor

Cursor - AI-Powered IDE

Professional DevelopersLarge Codebases
Try Cursor Free →