Google AntiGravity vs Zed
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Google AntiGravity
Zed
Google AntiGravity vs Zed comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Google AntiGravity is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Google AntiGravity and Zed compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Google AntiGravity leans on agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces while Zed emphasizes built in rust for speed, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Google AntiGravity offers free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers tba, whereas Zed lists free (open source core). Feature-wise, Google AntiGravity shines with agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces and multi-agent workflows that coordinate editor, terminal, and browser, while Zed stands out for built in rust for speed and multi-llm support. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Google AntiGravity if you need Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs and want a stack centered on Developer IDEs & Agents. Pick Zed when you value Rust Developers and prefer a tool that matches Developer IDEs & Agents. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Vibe Score Breakdown
Google AntiGravity
Zed
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Google AntiGravity | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers TBA | Free (Open Source core) |
| Primary Category | Developer IDEs & Agents | Developer IDEs & Agents |
| Best For | Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs | Rust Developers |
| Key Strength | Agent-first architecture with Manager and Editor surfaces | Built in Rust for speed |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Google AntiGravity vs Zed
- What is the main difference between Google AntiGravity and Zed?
- Google AntiGravity focuses on agent-first architecture with manager and editor surfaces while Zed highlights built in rust for speed. Both target developer ides & agents, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Zed leads in the Flow State dimension of the Vibe Score, so teams wanting fewer interruptions and faster loops should start there.
- How do Google AntiGravity and Zed compare on pricing?
- Google AntiGravity lists free public preview with generous rate limits; paid tiers tba, whereas Zed offers free (open source core). Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Google AntiGravity vs Zed?
- Google AntiGravity fits teams that value Developers exploring multi-agent IDEs, while Zed suits those prioritizing Rust Developers. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Google AntiGravity vs Zed comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.