Apache Maka vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Last reviewed:
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Apache Maka
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Quick Comparison
| Feature |  Apache Maka |  Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic / Autonomous Mode | ||
| Code Autocomplete | ||
| Chat / Prompt-Based Coding | ||
| Multi-file Editing | ||
| AI Models | , | GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary) |
Scroll down for in-depth category breakdowns ↓
Quick Verdict
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) wins 3 of 4 categories
Apache Maka vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf): find out which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a deep dive into AI capabilities, pricing, integrations, and real developer experience. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each tool unique so you can make the right choice for your next build.
The Winner
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is the Vibe Coding Champion
Trusted by teams using Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
AI & Coding Features
| Feature | Apache Maka | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic / Autonomous Mode | ||
| Code Autocomplete | ★ | |
| Chat / Prompt-Based Coding | ||
| Multi-file Editing | ★ | |
| AI Models | , | GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary) |
| Image / Design to Code | ★ |
Apache Maka is built around append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a runtimeevent you can inspect after the run, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) focuses on devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) uses GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary). The key question is whether you need agentic capabilities that autonomously handle multi-step tasks, or inline completions that keep you in flow as you type. Review the table above to see which AI features each tool actually offers.
Apache MakaDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Platform & Access
| Feature | Apache Maka | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Type | , | AI-first desktop IDE (VS Code fork) |
| Runs in Browser | ★ | |
| Built-in Deployment | ||
| Git Integration | ||
| Open Source | ★ |
Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) take different approaches to where and how you code. Whether a tool runs in your browser or requires a local install matters for getting started quickly. Built-in deployment means you can go from prompt to live app without switching tools. Consider what fits your workflow, some builders prefer everything in the browser, while others want the power of a local IDE.
Apache MakaDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Pricing & Cost
| Feature | Apache Maka | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan Available | ||
| Starting Price | Free (Apache 2.0); no Apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider | $20/month (Pro) |
| Token / Credit Based | ||
| Can Buy More Credits | ★ | |
| Has Daily / Usage Limits |
Apache Maka is priced at free (apache 2.0); no apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider, with a free entry point. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is priced at free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo, with a free entry point. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) uses a credit-based system, so costs scale with usage. Pay attention to daily limits, some tools throttle usage even on paid plans during heavy coding sessions. Check whether you can buy additional credits if you hit the ceiling mid-project.
Apache MakaDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Experience & Reviews
| Feature | Apache Maka | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner Friendly | ★ | |
| Target Audience | , | Developers wanting a polished AI-first IDE experience |
Apache Maka is aimed at experienced developers who are comfortable with code. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is accessible to beginners and non-developers looking to build with AI. The real test is how quickly you can go from idea to working app, setup time, documentation quality, and how intuitive the AI interaction feels all factor into the experience.
Apache MakaDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Feature data verified monthly. Some entries use automated inference. Report inaccuracy
Which Should You Choose?
Use these decision criteria to find the right tool for your workflow.
Choose Apache Maka if…
- ✓You work on local-first agent runs projects
- ✓You work on inspectable tool and permission logs projects
- ✓You need append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a runtimeevent you can inspect after the run
- ✓You need one runtime host behind the electron desktop app, the terminal ui, the non-interactive cli and the eval command
- ✓You need bring your own model: cloud api, local model or a compatible gateway; no bundled model account
Choose Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) if…
- ✓You want fast AI-powered code completions and agentic edits without being locked to a single IDE
- ✓You use JetBrains, Vim, Xcode, or another IDE and need AI that works consistently across 40+ editors
- ✓You work on large codebases and need rapid context retrieval via Fast Context and SWE-grep
- ✓You want visual code navigation (Codemaps) alongside AI-driven multi-step editing
- ✓You want comparable agentic depth to Cursor at a lower monthly price point
Why these tools are being compared
Both Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Apache Maka is built around append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a runtimeevent you can inspect after the run, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is designed for devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. This matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Apache Maka offers free (apache 2.0); no apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider, whereas Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) lists free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo. Feature-wise, Apache Maka stands out for append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a runtimeevent you can inspect after the run and one runtime host behind the electron desktop app, the terminal ui, the non-interactive cli and the eval command, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) delivers devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026 and agent command center: orchestrate devin cloud agents from the editor. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the feature breakdown below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Apache Maka if you need Local-first agent runs and want a stack centered on agent-infra. Pick Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) when you value Multi-IDE Teams and prefer a tool that matches ide-agents. Check the feature comparison above to see which tool fits your workflow best.
Interface Comparison
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Side-by-side interface comparison
At a Glance
| Detail | Apache Maka | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (Apache 2.0); no Apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider | Free / Pro $20/mo / Max $200/mo |
| Trusted Rating | N/A | 4.2/5 (G2) |
| Category | agent-infra | ide-agents |
| Best For | Local-first agent runs | Multi-IDE Teams |
| Key Strength | Append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a RuntimeEvent you can inspect after the run | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) by Cognition, rebranded June 2, 2026 |
FAQs: Apache Maka vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
- What is the main difference between Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)?
- Apache Maka focuses on append-only event log as the source of truth: every model message, tool call, permission decision and termination is a runtimeevent you can inspect after the run while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) highlights devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. Both target vibe coding workflows, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Both Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) aim for smooth iteration. Check the feature comparison above to see which matches your workflow, factors like setup time, AI responsiveness, and integration depth matter most.
- How do Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) compare on pricing?
- Apache Maka lists free (apache 2.0); no apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider, whereas Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) offers free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Apache Maka vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)?
- Apache Maka fits teams that value Local-first agent runs, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) suits those prioritizing Multi-IDE Teams. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
- Is Apache Maka or Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) better overall?
- "Better" depends on your specific workflow. Review the head-to-head feature comparisons above to identify which tool aligns with your priorities, pricing, integrations, and AI capabilities all factor in.
- Does Apache Maka have a free plan?
- Yes, Apache Maka offers a free entry point: Free (Apache 2.0); no Apache release yet, nightlies and source only; you pay your own model provider. This makes it easy to trial before committing to a paid plan.
- Can I use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for free?
- Yes, Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) has a free tier available: Free / Pro $20/mo / Max $200/mo. You can start without a credit card and upgrade when ready.
Apache Maka and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) differ most on price, model access, and how much of the workflow each one owns. The feature table and FAQs above carry the detail. Both have a free tier or a trial, so the fastest way to decide is to run the same small task through each and compare what you get back.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Apache Maka Alternatives
Compare Apache Maka with other agent-infra tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) Alternatives
Compare Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) with other ide-agents tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow
Apache Maka
Apache Maka (Incubating) - Local-First Agent Workspace With an Append-Only Run Log
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Devin Desktop: Agentic AI Editor by Cognition (Formerly Windsurf)