Muse Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Last reviewed:
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Muse Code
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Quick Comparison
| Feature |  Muse Code |  Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic / Autonomous Mode | ||
| Code Autocomplete | ||
| Chat / Prompt-Based Coding | ||
| Multi-file Editing | ||
| AI Models | , | GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary) |
Scroll down for in-depth category breakdowns ↓
Quick Verdict
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) wins 3 of 4 categories
Muse Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf): find out which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a deep dive into AI capabilities, pricing, integrations, and real developer experience. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each tool unique so you can make the right choice for your next build.
The Winner
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is the Vibe Coding Champion
Trusted by teams using Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
AI & Coding Features
| Feature | Muse Code | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic / Autonomous Mode | ||
| Code Autocomplete | ★ | |
| Chat / Prompt-Based Coding | ||
| Multi-file Editing | ★ | |
| AI Models | , | GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary) |
| Image / Design to Code | ★ |
Muse Code is built around one-million-token context window on muse spark 1.2, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) focuses on devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) uses GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, SWE-1.5 (proprietary). The key question is whether you need agentic capabilities that autonomously handle multi-step tasks, or inline completions that keep you in flow as you type. Review the table above to see which AI features each tool actually offers.
Muse CodeDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Platform & Access
| Feature | Muse Code | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Type | , | AI-first desktop IDE (VS Code fork) |
| Runs in Browser | ||
| Built-in Deployment | ★ | |
| Git Integration | ★ | |
| Open Source |
Muse Code and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) take different approaches to where and how you code. Whether a tool runs in your browser or requires a local install matters for getting started quickly. Built-in deployment means you can go from prompt to live app without switching tools. Consider what fits your workflow, some builders prefer everything in the browser, while others want the power of a local IDE.
Muse CodeDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Pricing & Cost
| Feature | Muse Code | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan Available | ★ | |
| Starting Price | Pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. That makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier. | $20/month (Pro) |
| Token / Credit Based | ||
| Can Buy More Credits | ★ | |
| Has Daily / Usage Limits |
Muse Code is priced at pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. that makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier.. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is priced at free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo, with a free entry point. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) uses a credit-based system, so costs scale with usage. Pay attention to daily limits, some tools throttle usage even on paid plans during heavy coding sessions. Check whether you can buy additional credits if you hit the ceiling mid-project.
Muse CodeDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Experience & Reviews
| Feature | Muse Code | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner Friendly | ||
| Target Audience | , | Developers wanting a polished AI-first IDE experience |
Muse Code is accessible to beginners and non-developers looking to build with AI. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is accessible to beginners and non-developers looking to build with AI. The real test is how quickly you can go from idea to working app, setup time, documentation quality, and how intuitive the AI interaction feels all factor into the experience.
Muse CodeDevin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)Feature data verified monthly. Some entries use automated inference. Report inaccuracy
What to do next
Related Comparisons
Which Should You Choose?
Use these decision criteria to find the right tool for your workflow.
Choose Muse Code if…
- ✓You work on large repositories that need a big context window projects
- ✓You work on teams who prefer per-token billing to per-seat licences projects
- ✓You need one-million-token context window on muse spark 1.2
- ✓You need terminal agent, installed with a single curl command
- ✓You need multiple agents coordinate on every task
Choose Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) if…
- ✓You want fast AI-powered code completions and agentic edits without being locked to a single IDE
- ✓You use JetBrains, Vim, Xcode, or another IDE and need AI that works consistently across 40+ editors
- ✓You work on large codebases and need rapid context retrieval via Fast Context and SWE-grep
- ✓You want visual code navigation (Codemaps) alongside AI-driven multi-step editing
- ✓You want comparable agentic depth to Cursor at a lower monthly price point
Why these tools are being compared
Both Muse Code and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Muse Code is built around one-million-token context window on muse spark 1.2, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is designed for devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. This matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Muse Code offers pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. that makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier., whereas Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) lists free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo. Feature-wise, Muse Code stands out for one-million-token context window on muse spark 1.2 and terminal agent, installed with a single curl command, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) delivers devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026 and agent command center: orchestrate devin cloud agents from the editor. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the feature breakdown below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Muse Code if you need Large repositories that need a big context window and want a stack centered on ide-agents. Pick Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) when you value Multi-IDE Teams and prefer a tool that matches ide-agents. Check the feature comparison above to see which tool fits your workflow best.
Interface Comparison
Muse Code
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Side-by-side interface comparison
At a Glance
| Detail | Muse Code | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. That makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier. | Free / Pro $20/mo / Max $200/mo |
| Trusted Rating | N/A | 4.2/5 (G2) |
| Category | ide-agents | ide-agents |
| Best For | Large repositories that need a big context window | Multi-IDE Teams |
| Key Strength | One-million-token context window on Muse Spark 1.2 | Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) by Cognition, rebranded June 2, 2026 |
FAQs: Muse Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
- What is the main difference between Muse Code and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)?
- Muse Code focuses on one-million-token context window on muse spark 1.2 while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) highlights devin desktop (formerly windsurf) by cognition, rebranded june 2, 2026. Both target ide-agents, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Both Muse Code and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) aim for smooth iteration. Check the feature comparison above to see which matches your workflow, factors like setup time, AI responsiveness, and integration depth matter most.
- How do Muse Code and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) compare on pricing?
- Muse Code lists pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. that makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier., whereas Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) offers free / pro $20/mo / max $200/mo. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Muse Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)?
- Muse Code fits teams that value Large repositories that need a big context window, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) suits those prioritizing Multi-IDE Teams. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
- Is Muse Code or Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) better overall?
- "Better" depends on your specific workflow. Review the head-to-head feature comparisons above to identify which tool aligns with your priorities, pricing, integrations, and AI capabilities all factor in.
- Does Muse Code have a free plan?
- Muse Code does not appear to offer a free tier. Pricing starts at Pay per token, no subscription. muse-spark-1.2-contributor is $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.002 cached, $0.20 output, and your data is used for product improvement. muse-spark-1.2 is $1.25 per million input, $0.15 cached, $4.25 output, and your data is not. That makes the privacy-preserving tier roughly 12 times the input cost and 21 times the output cost of the contributor tier.. Check the official site for any trial options or money-back guarantees.
- Can I use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for free?
- Yes, Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) has a free tier available: Free / Pro $20/mo / Max $200/mo. You can start without a credit card and upgrade when ready.
In summary, Muse Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Muse Code Alternatives
Compare Muse Code with other ide-agents tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) Alternatives
Compare Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) with other ide-agents tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Keep comparing
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow
Muse Code
Muse Code - Meta's Terminal Coding Agent on Muse Spark 1.2
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Devin Desktop: Agentic AI Editor by Cognition (Formerly Windsurf)