Continue.dev vs Refact.ai
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Continue.dev
Refact.ai
Continue.dev vs Refact.ai comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Continue.dev is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Continue.dev and Refact.ai compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Continue.dev leans on connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama while Refact.ai emphasizes refactoring focus, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Continue.dev offers free, whereas Refact.ai lists free & paid plans. Feature-wise, Continue.dev shines with connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama and privacy-first: run locally without sending code externally, while Refact.ai stands out for refactoring focus and local/remote models. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Continue.dev if you need Privacy-Conscious Developers and want a stack centered on AI Assistants & Code Review. Pick Refact.ai when you value Tech Leads and prefer a tool that matches AI Assistants & Code Review. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Vibe Score Breakdown
Continue.dev
Refact.ai
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Continue.dev | Refact.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free & Paid plans |
| Trusted Rating | 4.3/5 (G2) | N/A |
| Primary Category | AI Assistants & Code Review | AI Assistants & Code Review |
| Best For | Privacy-Conscious Developers | Tech Leads |
| Key Strength | Connect any LLM: OpenAI, Anthropic, local models via Ollama | Refactoring focus |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Continue.dev vs Refact.ai
- What is the main difference between Continue.dev and Refact.ai?
- Continue.dev focuses on connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama while Refact.ai highlights refactoring focus. Both target ai assistants & code review, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Check the Vibe Score Breakdown above; higher flow and speed numbers signal smoother iteration for your team.
- How do Continue.dev and Refact.ai compare on pricing?
- Continue.dev lists free, whereas Refact.ai offers free & paid plans. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Continue.dev vs Refact.ai?
- Continue.dev fits teams that value Privacy-Conscious Developers, while Refact.ai suits those prioritizing Tech Leads. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Continue.dev vs Refact.ai comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Continue.dev Alternatives
Compare Continue.dev with other AI Assistants & Code Review tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Refact.ai Alternatives
Compare Refact.ai with other AI Assistants & Code Review tools and find the best alternative for your workflow
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow
Continue.dev
Continue.dev - Open-Source AI Coding Assistant