Cody vs Continue.dev
The definitive head-to-head comparison for Vibe Coders.
Cody
Continue.dev
Cody vs Continue.dev comparison: discover which platform fits your Vibe Coding workflow with a quick snapshot of pricing, categories, and standout strengths. This head-to-head overview highlights what makes each option unique so searchers and builders immediately see the differentiators.
The Winner
Cody is the Vibe Coding Champion
Why these tools are being compared
Both Cody and Continue.dev compete for builders who want fast, AI-assisted creation without losing control of their stack. Cody leans on code graph context while Continue.dev emphasizes connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama, so this matchup helps clarify which strengths matter most for your next launch.
Feature and pricing takeaways
On pricing, Cody offers free / $9/mo and up, whereas Continue.dev lists free. Feature-wise, Cody shines with code graph context and enterprise workflows, while Continue.dev stands out for connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama and privacy-first: run locally without sending code externally. If you care about AI speed and responsiveness, compare the Vibe Score dimensions below to see which tool keeps your flow steady.
Who should choose each tool
Choose Cody if you need Enterprise Teams and want a stack centered on AI Assistants & Code Review. Pick Continue.dev when you value Privacy-Conscious Developers and prefer a tool that matches AI Assistants & Code Review. If you simply want the highest overall Vibe Score, the winner banner above makes that choice obvious.
Vibe Score Breakdown
Cody
Continue.dev
Feature Showdown
| Feature | Cody | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / $9/mo and up | Free |
| Trusted Rating | 4.5/5 (G2) | 4.3/5 (G2) |
| Primary Category | AI Assistants & Code Review | AI Assistants & Code Review |
| Best For | Enterprise Teams | Privacy-Conscious Developers |
| Key Strength | Code graph context | Connect any LLM: OpenAI, Anthropic, local models via Ollama |
| AI Model | Integrated | Integrated |
FAQs: Cody vs Continue.dev
- What is the main difference between Cody and Continue.dev?
- Cody focuses on code graph context while Continue.dev highlights connect any llm: openai, anthropic, local models via ollama. Both target ai assistants & code review, but their onboarding, AI depth, and pricing models feel different.
- Which tool is better for speed and flow?
- Check the Vibe Score Breakdown above; higher flow and speed numbers signal smoother iteration for your team.
- How do Cody and Continue.dev compare on pricing?
- Cody lists free / $9/mo and up, whereas Continue.dev offers free. Consider which aligns with your budget and whether you need free tiers, seat-based plans, or bundled AI features.
- Who should choose Cody vs Continue.dev?
- Cody fits teams that value Enterprise Teams, while Continue.dev suits those prioritizing Privacy-Conscious Developers. If you need category-specific guardrails, start with the tool that matches your daily workflows.
In summary, Cody vs Continue.dev comes down to how you prioritize speed, AI assistance, and pricing flexibility. Scan the feature showdown, Vibe Score charts, and FAQs to match your workflow, then jump into the free trials to feel which experience delivers the best vibe.
Looking for more options?
Explore comprehensive alternative guides for both tools to find the perfect fit for your needs
Ready to make your choice?
Try both tools for free and discover which one fits your vibe coding workflow
Continue.dev
Continue.dev - Open-Source AI Coding Assistant